How does an EN UPE 200 channel compare dimensionally to a GB C200x75x7 channel?

Nov 28, 2025

Leave a message

The EN UPE 200 (parallel-flange channel) and GB C200x75x7 (hot-rolled channel, GB/T 707) are near-equivalent for medium-load applications, with minor dimensional variances that require minimal adjustments for substitution:

 

Dimensional Breakdown (Metric)

Dimension EN UPE 200 (S355JR) GB C200x75x7 (Q355B) Variance Practical Impact
Depth (h) 200 mm 200 mm 0 mm Identical-no fit issues with vertical brackets.
Flange Width (b) 75 mm 75 mm 0 mm Same flange width-bolts align with GB holes (e.g., M12 bolts fit both).
Web Thickness (d) 6.5 mm 7.0 mm -0.5 mm UPE's thinner web reduces shear capacity by ~7% (115 kN vs. 123 kN). No stiffeners needed for light loads.
Flange Thickness (t) 10.0 mm 11.0 mm -1.0 mm UPE's thinner flange reduces bending capacity by ~8% (158 cm³ vs. 172 cm³). Use UPE 220 (195 cm³) for equivalent capacity.
Weight (w) 26.2 kg/m 28.8 kg/m -2.6 kg/m UPE is lighter-reduces transportation and support costs.
Section Modulus (Wx) 158 cm³ 172 cm³ -14 cm³ Compensate with a larger UPE size (e.g., UPE 220) for heavy bending loads.

 

Substitution Steps

Load Capacity Check: For a 6-meter span supporting 20 kN/m, UPE 200's bending stress (20×6²×10⁶/(8×158×10⁻⁶) = 696 MPa) exceeds S355JR's yield strength (355 MPa). Switch to UPE 220 (Wx=195 cm³) to reduce stress to 554 MPa, then add a second channel for safety.

Bracket Adjustment: UPE's thinner web requires shorter bolts (M12×25 vs. M12×30 for GB) to ensure proper thread engagement.

Welding: Use 6 mm fillet welds (vs. 7 mm for GB) to match UPE's flange thickness-no changes to current/voltage settings (200 A, 28 V for GMAW).

This alignment makes UPE 200 a cost-effective substitute for C200x75x7, with targeted adjustments for heavy loads.